ThePhysicsOfLearning

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Home
The Physics of Learning Blog

Problem Based Learning

E-mail Print PDF

Last week I had my first try at implementing Problem Based Learning (PBL) in physics. We were about to study Heat Energy and it seemed like a natural fit for presenting an authentic problem. I chose to make a scenario that was based on my previous work as a mechanical energy. Have a look below…

PBL - Heat Energy

From what I understand, PBL should be based on authentic situations where the solution is non-obvious such that the students need to engage their meta-cognition. As well, the problem needs to build upon prior knowledge and hopefully it can be multi-disciplinary. I think that in these respects, my above problems works very nicely. Having used in the class, I would say that it okay, but not perfect..

I set aside two days in the library to work on the problem and I wasn’t sure what to expect. To help the kids with resources, I put together an information package on heat and pointed the students towards www.physicsclassroom.com. I would have liked to have more print resources available but heat energy and transfer is typically reserved for upper level physics texts and generally well above the reach of physics 11 students. During the first class I had to step back and try to wipe a big grin off of my face because I had all my students clearly engaged in the problem, exploring solutions and learning about heat. It was inspiring to see.

Time flew by during the first class, and there were a couple of groups that hadn’t progressed too far. I decided to go back to the library for another session. This worked out okay for the most part but if I were to do it again, I would maybe stay in the classroom for the second class, and just have the groups exchange ideas.

In terms of evaluation the effectiveness of the PBL, I’m not too sure yet. I followed up the two PBL classes with a class where we zoomed through some notes, along with some practice problems. All told we spent 3 classes on heat. In my mind, this is an example of depth vs. breadth. At other times I have done heat we spent more time on more sub-topics (phase changes). If time wasn’t an issue, I would have done a lab where the students try to measure the temperature of a piece of heated metal. But hey! There’s always next year.

I also wanted feedback from the students to see what they thought about the PBL process. Below are some quotes that best described their reflections.

“This activity did allow me to learn about the various aspects of heat energy. I think that I learnt it all effectively, as when we reviewed the information in class it felt like a review. However, I found that actually finding the information on the internet was difficult. For some of the topics, such as heat, there were web pages which were full of very complicated equations which we don’t need to know at our level. Finding all the information that was pertinent to our topic was difficult, and then actually trying to understand the information given was a whole new ball game… It was quite nice not to be sitting in a classroom for a day, but I think that next time perhaps only one day trying to scour web pages for information, and perhaps the second day that we originally spent in the lab we could instead use in the classroom pooling all our findings.”

“… Which shows that we are not only learnt more about physics, but what good sources are and where to look for information. I found this project difficult because at first we were not given a lot to work off of, but after the help it became easier. All in all, I enjoyed having a self guided learning lab with just a bit of guidance. I liked having a chance to acquire the manual and mental skills associated with physics through a hands on experience. Any subject cannot simply be transmitted through words from a teacher. Lastly, I liked having to solve someone’s problem that seemed realistic because that way I could see more of a point to it as it relates to life.”

“Overall, I found this problem-based environment is a very useful tool in learning more about physics. It does not let us merely solve questions by having numbers in a simple problem, but rather, it allows us to come in contact with real-life situations, in this case problems in industry physics, and find solutions from different aspects. I believe that real physics learning should be like this, rather than aiming to achieve a one-and-only correct answer like what we do on normal tests. Therefore, I think we should have more problem-based experiments in future learning.”

It seems to me that the PBL was a big success. Many students said that the task was interesting, fun, engaging and seemed like real-life. A common complaint was that it was very difficult at first and confusing. However, I think this is okay and that the students did have appropriate scaffolding prior to the problem, having learnt about conservation of energy, temperature and heat previously. Some students thought that two classes was too long, and this definitely needs to be considered for next time. Of course there were a few students that prefer notes and being told what they should know, but not everyone can be pleased all the time.


Last Updated on Sunday, 13 May 2012 09:34
 

SBG Presentation

E-mail Print PDF

I'm going to be hosting a short presentation on Standards Based Grading (SBG) at my school today.  I'm not sure how many people will show up, but hopefully it kicks off some good discussion for future collaboration meetings.


Standards Based Grading

 

Community Building

E-mail Print PDF

Our class time at school has been pretty messed up in the past week or two.  Job action restricted class hours and then last week we missed three days due to the strike. This was followed by two days of classes, but they were compromised because of the upcoming 2 week spring break (which we're in right now).  Many students were absent and it's difficult to start a new topic at this time, which is exactly what I've wanted to do for the past 2 weeks.


In Friday's physics 12 class I decided to skip the intro to electrostatics and instead we did some class building.  I had the students split into groups and asked them to discuss what they thought about our current approach to class work and homework. I sort of thought that the groups wouldn't take it too serious, and I was right.  After only a few minutes it was obvious that not a lot of on-topic discussion was happening so we then gathered as a group and I started asking everyone for their thoughts.  For the next 30 minutes everyone was engaged and part of a community experience.


I think the students really enjoyed and appreciated having a voice in what happens in our classroom, and I think both myself and the students gained a lot from the discussion. I now have a better feeling for the students' point of view and have some new great ideas, while the students have a better understanding of my philosophy and where I'm coming from.  Key topics that were raised include:

  • Students want more example is problems done for them
  • Some students think there could be homework checks
  • Many students think they are solely responsible for homework
  • While starting new topics, it was suggested that I should explicitly link parts of our notes to specific learning objectives (great idea)
  • Some students appreciate being given a chance to solve problems before I do the question
  • No one likes the problems in the textbook, and they don't like carrying the textbook
  • Some students would like more practice questions and I explained that I'm slowly building up my stack of questions


In terms of my input, the following were the bits that I focused on:

  • I philosophically, with the support of research, oppose the idea of doing many example problems. This takes away from active learning and changes the learning into more of a process oriented, teacher-centered activity.
  • I don't like going over problems when many (most) students haven't attempted the problem yet - but I appreciate that I should attend to this more.
  • I don't like the idea of classifying questions into "types" of problems. In my opinion, this reduces the problems to formulaic solutions. The goal is learn about physics, not learn to follow a process for solving word problems
  • A few students identified how they like to try and work through problems with their classmates, and I tied this to the polling / peer instruction that we do, and why it is important


I think our group discussion not was very worthwhile, and it was interesting that almost every student had something to say.  I'll make a few minor changes to what happens in class, and now that I know some of the students' concerns I can hopefully be a bit preemptive to problems they may have.


 

Mechanics Baseline 2011/12

E-mail Print PDF

Last week in Physics 12 we finished mechanics.  From here on in it will be electricity, electricity, electricity.  Shocking, I know....

To finish off mechanics, I gave my students a mechanics baseline test for the second time.  The first time was during the 2nd week of school, back in September.  The results are in, and I suppose that in some ways these results are a measure of:

  • time spent on the topics
  • teacher effectiveness
  • student engagement
  • tutor effectiveness (many of my students have tutors)
  • student aptitude in the time frame and conditions given


For 51 students, the overall average in September was 40%.  In March, there was some mild improvement to 52%.

Four students improved their score by more than double, where one of these students tripled their original score.  A few students regressed, which is sort of hard to believe.  Amazingly, there was one question that every single student answered incorrectly (indentifying the direction of acceleration of an object in circular motion.

I actually meant to give out the Force Concept Inventory test at the beginning of the year, but I gave out the baseline test by mistake.  Oops.  I would assume that the results would be somewhat similar between these two.

I don't know if I should be happy that the students went from 40% to 52%.  I would have liked to have seen 75%.  I did note that the students looked extremely fatigued during the test, as their lives are under quite a bit of stress right now due to:

  • end of term, and marks will be used for university applications
  • many other tests and projects for other subjects given at the same time
  • many of the students are involved with the school play, and the late nights involved with that
In any event, I'm unhappy with the results and can only hope to improve what I bring to the classroom next year, in order to see bigger gains.

 
  • «
  •  Start 
  •  prev 
  •  1 
  •  2 
  •  3 
  •  4 
  •  5 
  •  6 
  •  7 
  •  next 
  •  End 
  • »


Page 1 of 7

Email Subscription

Twitter

bcphysics: No need for the past tense. RT @markbrumley: Why rating teachers by test scores won’t work http://t.co/a9TQEzbi #k12 #education
bcphysics: Overheard in my classroom. "This gets us ready for real life." Other student response: "this IS real life."
bcphysics: RT @pattibacchus: Thought this day couldn't get any more beautiful and then along comes Opera Man on South Granville, belting it out. Love that guy.

Login Form

Newsflash

Joomla! 1.5 - 'Experience the Freedom'!. It has never been easier to create your own dynamic Web site. Manage all your content from the best CMS admin interface and in virtually any language you speak.